11 Best Alternatives to Greenhouse®

Shortlist

Tool	Best For
Ashby	Data-driven scale-ups that want best-in-class analytics
Workable	Mid-market teams wanting transparent, published pricing
Plural	Small businesses (10–75 employees) wanting enterprise features at SMB prices

Looking for a Greenhouse Alternative?

Greenhouse® is one of the few platforms that operates as a complete, structured-hiring operating system. It takes applicant tracking further by enforcing consistent interview processes, scorecards, and data-driven decision-making across the whole hiring team, and it was ranked the #1 ATS in 46 key G2 Summer 2026 reports (placing in the top three across 82), after taking the #1 spot in 57 Spring and 58 Winter 2026 reports.

But while Greenhouse is undeniably powerful, many small and mid-size teams find it heavier and pricier than they need. Greenhouse doesn’t publish pricing, runs every deal through a sales demo, charges based on total company headcount rather than recruiter seats, and adds implementation fees on top. Reviews repeatedly flag that it’s “expensive for smaller teams,” “complex to set up,” and that reporting customization is limited.

If that sounds familiar and you’re exploring tools that match your stage, budget, and team size, here you’ll find the top 11 alternatives to consider.

Why Trust Us

We built Plural, an AI-native applicant tracking system and branded careers-page platform purpose-built for small businesses (10–75 employees). Every day we help lean teams run modern, structured hiring with branded careers pages, AI application scoring, semantic candidate search, and interview scheduling, without enterprise complexity or six-figure contracts.

That gives us a front-row seat into what small teams actually need from an ATS versus what they’re forced to overpay for. So when we compare Greenhouse alternatives, we’re not guessing. We’re sharing insight from building, shipping, and pricing recruiting software for the exact teams Greenhouse prices out.

What Is Greenhouse?

Greenhouse hiring software unifies sourcing, applicant tracking, structured interviewing, and onboarding into a single system so teams can make consistent, fair, data-driven hiring decisions. Instead of ad-hoc, one-size-fits-all processes, Greenhouse helps companies define the role, requirements, and ideal-candidate attributes before a job is posted. It serves more than 7,000 companies, including HubSpot, Anthropic, Coinbase, the NFL, and Duolingo.

At its core, Greenhouse combines:

• Structured Hiring: Scorecards, interview kits, and defined hiring plans for every role
• Applicant Tracking: Centralized pipelines, candidate profiles, and collaboration tools
• AI Tools: Real Talent™ candidate matching plus built-in fraud detection and identity verification
• Reporting & Analytics: Dashboards tying activity to time-to-hire, cost-per-hire, and source effectiveness
• Integrations: A 400+ pre-built integration ecosystem plus a governed MCP for connecting AI tools

It’s built for mid-market and enterprise teams that want to run hiring as a rigorous, scalable operation, from first touch to onboarding.

Why Consider a Greenhouse Alternative?

Even though the structured-hiring depth in Greenhouse hiring software is impressive, that same depth can create friction depending on your team’s stage, resources, or budget. Common reasons companies explore alternatives:

1. It Can Feel Like More Platform Than You Need

Greenhouse is designed as a full structured-hiring operating system, not a lightweight ATS. For small teams that just want to post jobs, track candidates, and schedule interviews, it can feel overwhelming.

2. The Pricing Is Opaque and Enterprise-Sized

Greenhouse doesn’t publish pricing. Buyer-reported data puts entry-level SMB contracts at roughly $6,500/year, mid-market at $15,000–$40,000/year, and enterprise above $70,000/year, and pricing scales with total company headcount, not the number of recruiters using it.

3. You Have to Sit Through a Sales Demo

There’s no free trial or self-serve signup. Evaluation runs through a demo-and-proposal process, and implementation fees of $1,000–$15,000 are common on top of the subscription.

4. Setup and Reporting Add Friction

Reviewers consistently mention a complex setup process and that reporting customization is “limited” and “not intuitive,” often requiring multiple reports to get the granularity they need.

5. Smaller Teams Get Priced Out

Across G2, Capterra, and the BBB, small businesses report that Greenhouse is expensive and inflexible for low-volume hiring, with one start-up calling the sales process a poor fit for a company “with limited resources.”

11 Greenhouse Alternatives Worth Considering in 2026

Here are the top 11 Greenhouse alternatives. Each solves a slightly different piece of the hiring puzzle, so you can choose based on your team’s stage, stack, and budget.

Tool	Best For	Core Strength	Why Choose It Over Greenhouse	G2 Rating	Pricing
Ashby	Data-driven scale-ups	Best-in-class analytics + all-in-one ATS/CRM/scheduling	Modern UX and deep reporting in one platform	⭐ 4.7	$400/mo+ / custom
Workable	Mid-market teams wanting transparent pricing	Published pricing, 200+ job boards, AI sourcing	No sales call to see prices; month-to-month available	⭐ 4.4	$149–$719/mo
Lever	Mid-market teams blending inbound + outbound hiring	ATS + CRM in one with AI screening	Strong nurture/CRM for proactive sourcing	⭐ 4.3	Custom (~$6K+/yr)
Plural	Small businesses (10–75 employees)	Enterprise-grade AI features at SMB prices	Free to start, no demo, transparent low pricing	New	Free–$999+/mo
BambooHR	SMBs wanting HRIS + light ATS in one	Full HR suite with built-in applicant tracking	One vendor for HR and recruiting	⭐ 4.5	~$10–$25/emp/mo
Teamtailor	Teams that lead with employer branding	Best-in-class no-code career site builder	Marketing-first hiring, unlimited users	⭐ 4.5	Custom (~$229/mo+)
JazzHR	Small businesses wanting flat-fee, unlimited-user pricing	Transparent pricing, unlimited users	Cheap entry point, no per-seat fees	⭐ 4.3	$75–$420/mo
Breezy HR	Small teams wanting a free tier and visual pipelines	Drag-and-drop Kanban pipelines, free Bootstrap plan	Free plan + flat monthly pricing	⭐ 4.4	Free–$439/mo
Pinpoint	In-house teams prioritizing candidate experience	Polished career sites + included implementation	Unlimited seats, white-glove onboarding	⭐ 4.6	~$600–$2,400/mo+
Recruitee	Collaborative hiring teams	Easy collaborative hiring + large job-board reach	Simpler than Greenhouse, unlimited users	⭐ 4.5	From ~€301/mo (quote)
Manatal	Agencies and lean teams wanting the cheapest AI ATS	AI scoring + recruitment CRM at $15/user	Lowest price with real AI features	⭐ 4.3	$15–$55/user/mo

1. Ashby

Best For

Data-driven scale-ups and engineering-led teams that want best-in-class analytics and an all-in-one ATS without stitching tools together.

Ashby is the modern, premium all-in-one recruiting platform that high-growth tech companies default to in 2026. It bundles applicant tracking, sourcing CRM, interview scheduling, and genuinely powerful analytics into one polished product, with AI baked in: natural-language candidate filtering, an AI Notetaker, and a Candidate Assistant. Reviewers consistently say it replaces multiple tools (Gem, Calendly, separate BI), with one G2 reviewer noting it saved their org $100K+ by consolidating their stack.

Key Features

• Full ATS with configurable pipelines and permissions
• Built-in sourcing CRM and advanced scheduling automation
• Custom analytics dashboards and deep funnel reporting
• AI candidate filtering, AI Notetaker, and Candidate Assistant
• Developer-friendly API and 200+ integrations

What It Offers Over Greenhouse

Ashby’s analytics and reporting customization are stronger and more modern than what Greenhouse Recruiting offers out of the box, and its interface is widely considered cleaner. For data-oriented teams that run talent acquisition as a data operation, Ashby often wins on UX and reporting depth.

But it’s a premium product. The Foundations plan starts at $400/month for teams up to 100 employees, and Plus/Enterprise tiers are custom-quoted, commonly running $30,000–$120,000/year. There’s no free trial, and the signature analytics features are gated behind higher tiers. It’s roughly double the price of Greenhouse or Lever at equivalent sizes for small teams.

G2 Rating	⭐ 4.7 out of 5
Pricing	Foundations starts at $400/month (≤100 employees); Plus and Enterprise are custom-quoted and can reach $120,000+/year. No free trial. AI add-ons priced separately.

2. Workable

Best For

Mid-market teams that want a full-featured ATS with transparent, published pricing and the option to start month-to-month.

Workable is one of the few mid-market ATS platforms that actually publishes its rates. It’s a complete hiring platform: post to 200+ job boards with one click, source from a database of 400M+ profiles, and speed up hiring with AI-powered screening, self-scheduled interviews, and automated offers. It also offers an optional HR module, positioning it as more than a pure ATS. Trusted by over 30,000 companies in more than 100 countries, it was named Best AI-Powered Recruiting Platform for 2025 by Forbes Advisor.

Key Features

• One-click posting to 200+ job boards
• AI-powered sourcing from 400M+ candidate profiles
• Self-scheduling, automated offers, and texting
• Customizable pipelines and reporting dashboards
• 270+ integrations (Gmail, Google Calendar, Teams, Zoom, BambooHR)

What It Offers Over Greenhouse

Workable’s biggest advantage over Greenhouse is transparency: you can see prices without a sales call, and a 15-day free trial (no credit card) lets you test the full Standard plan. That’s more generous than Greenhouse, which requires a paid annual contract upfront.

The catch is the model. Workable prices on total employee headcount, not hiring volume, so your bill climbs as you grow even if you hire at the same pace. Essential features like video interviews ($99/mo) and SMS texting ($79/mo) are add-ons that can push the real Standard cost well above the $299 sticker.

G2 Rating	⭐ 4.4 out of 5 (~705 reviews)
Pricing	Starter $149/mo (some sources list $169–$189), Standard $299/mo, Premier $599/mo, Enterprise $719/mo (annual billing), scaled by headcount. 15-day free trial, no credit card.

3. Lever

Best For

Mid-market teams that blend inbound applications with proactive outbound sourcing and want both managed in one platform.

Lever (now part of Employ Inc., which also owns JazzHR and Jobvite) combines an ATS with a built-in talent CRM, marketed as LeverTRM. It’s known for a clean, intuitive interface and strong collaboration features, and in 2026 it’s been rolling out AI candidate matching, unlimited AI interview transcripts and summaries, and AI fraud-prevention signals.

Key Features

• ATS + CRM in one platform for sourcing and nurturing
• Out-of-the-box dashboards and customizable reports
• AI-powered candidate matching and screening
• Unlimited AI interview transcripts and summaries
• Nurture campaigns and career-site tools

What It Offers Over Greenhouse

Lever’s built-in CRM and nurture campaigns make it a strong fit for teams that do real outbound sourcing, not just inbound tracking. Many reviewers find its workflows simpler to adopt than the structured-hiring rigor in Greenhouse hiring software.

Like Greenhouse, though, Lever doesn’t publish pricing. You start with a “Watch a Demo” button and a discovery call. Buyer data puts contracts at roughly $6,000/year for small teams up to $144,000+/year for large enterprises, priced on total headcount. Contracts are annual, with 8–15% renewal increases commonly reported and implementation fees of $2,000–$10,000+.

G2 Rating	⭐ 4.3 out of 5 (~2,100 reviews)
Pricing	Custom, quote-only. Buyer-reported range ~$6,000–$144,000+/year by headcount. Annual contracts; implementation and AI add-ons extra.

4. Plural

Best For

Small businesses (10–75 employees) that want the same features as the top enterprise ATS providers (branded careers pages, AI screening, semantic search, scheduling) at a fraction of the price, without sales demos or enterprise complexity.

Plural is an AI-native applicant tracking system and branded careers-page platform built specifically for small teams. The pitch is simple: the platforms above are powerful but priced and engineered for big companies. Plural delivers the capabilities small teams actually use, and skips the six-figure contracts, headcount-based billing, mandatory demos, and multi-week implementations that come with enterprise tools.

Crucially, Plural isn’t a stripped-down “lite” ATS. It offers the same core capabilities as the leading providers: branded, customizable careers pages; full applicant tracking and pipeline management; AI application scoring and resume screening; semantic candidate search; and interview scheduling with calendar sync. It connects to the tools small teams already use (Slack, Microsoft Teams, and Google Chat), and, as an AI-native platform, integrates directly with Claude and ChatGPT so you can interact with your hiring data using natural-language AI prompts.

Key Features

• Branded, customizable careers pages, not a generic ATS subdomain
• Applicant tracking with structured pipelines
• AI application scoring and resume screening
• Semantic candidate search (search by meaning, not just keywords)
• Interview scheduling with calendar sync
• Native integrations with Slack, Microsoft Teams, and Google Chat
• AI assistant integration with Claude and ChatGPT

What It Offers Over Greenhouse

Plural solves the two biggest points of friction small teams hit with Greenhouse: price and complexity.

• Greenhouse is priced for the enterprise. Plural is free to start (no credit card required) with a 14-day free trial, then scales through transparent tiers: Core at $59/month, Grow at $299/month, and Enterprise at $999+/month. There’s no headcount-based billing surprise and no mandatory sales call to see a number.
• Greenhouse is built for dedicated talent-ops teams. Plural is built for the founder, office manager, or HR generalist who wears five hats. You can launch a branded careers page and start screening candidates with AI the same day, with no kickoff workshop, no implementation fee, and no enterprise onboarding.

For a 10–75 person company that wants modern, AI-powered hiring without paying $15,000–$70,000/year or sitting through demos, Plural delivers enterprise-grade features at a significant discount.

G2 Rating	New
Pricing	Free to start (no credit card), with a 14-day free trial. Paid tiers: Core $59/mo, Grow $299/mo, Enterprise $999+/mo. Simple, transparent, self-serve.

5. BambooHR

Best For

Small and mid-size businesses that want a full HR system (records, time-off, onboarding) with built-in applicant tracking, rather than a standalone ATS.

BambooHR is the top-rated HRIS for SMBs, and its applicant tracking is one module within a broader people-management suite. If your real need is a single system of record for employee data plus light recruiting, BambooHR is a natural fit. Its 92% ease-of-use score leads the industry, and it includes the AI assistant “Ask BambooHR.”

Key Features

• Centralized employee database and self-service
• Built-in ATS with job posting and offer management
• Time-off, onboarding, and performance tools
• “Ask BambooHR” AI assistant and mobile app
• 150+ integrations (Slack, Indeed, Google Calendar)

What It Offers Over Greenhouse

BambooHR wins when you want HR and recruiting under one roof from one vendor, rather than buying a dedicated ATS and integrating it. Its onboarding-to-employee-record handoff is seamless.

But its ATS is intentionally basic. It covers roughly 80% of SMB recruiting needs (job posting, tracking, scheduling, offers) and lacks the AI screening or CRM-style nurturing of dedicated tools. Pricing is per-employee (~$10/Core, $17/Pro, $25/Elite per employee per month), quote-led, with a $250/month floor for teams under 25 and add-on costs for performance, payroll, and time tracking. Like all per-employee models, the bill grows with headcount.

G2 Rating	⭐ 4.5 out of 5 (2,100+ reviews on G2; 4,000+ across G2 and Capterra)
Pricing	Roughly $10–$25 per employee per month (Core/Pro/Elite), quote-led; $250/month minimum under 25 employees. Add-ons extra.

6. Teamtailor

Best For

Mid-market teams and scale-ups whose hiring strategy centers on employer branding and a polished, candidate-facing career site.

Teamtailor is the all-in-one recruiting platform built around employer branding. Its standout feature is a no-code, drag-and-drop career-site builder that rivals modern website builders like Squarespace, letting talent teams ship beautiful, personalized career pages without engineering help. It pairs that with a clean ATS, automation triggers, and an AI assistant called Co-pilot.

Key Features

• Best-in-class no-code career site builder
• Visual pipelines and automation triggers
• AI Co-pilot for job descriptions and candidate summaries
• Talent pools and light CRM/nurture campaigns
• 400+ integrations; unlimited users on all tiers

What It Offers Over Greenhouse

Where Greenhouse treats the career page as a functional afterthought, Teamtailor makes it a strategic, conversion-optimized asset, and it includes unlimited users at every tier, unlike the headcount-based pricing Greenhouse uses. Reviewers love its Apple-like, intuitive UI.

The trade-off: Teamtailor doesn’t publish pricing, uses a job-slot-based custom model, requires a 12-month minimum with 3–8% annual escalators, and gates AI Co-pilot, resume screening, and nurture campaigns behind its higher Business tier. Its AI screening also relies more on keyword matching than deep semantic analysis.

G2 Rating	⭐ 4.5 out of 5 (~363 reviews)
Pricing	Custom, quote-only. Reported entry around $229/month (~$2,750/year); average contract ~$17,000/year. Job-slot based, 12-month minimum, 14-day trial available.

7. JazzHR

Best For

Small businesses that want a no-frills, transparently priced ATS with unlimited users and predictable flat-fee billing.

JazzHR (also owned by Employ Inc.) is one of the most affordable and transparent ATS options for small businesses. It charges a flat fee per plan tier rather than per recruiter seat, so every hiring manager, coordinator, and interviewer is included, a genuine advantage for distributed hiring teams. It’s used by 10,000+ small and mid-sized businesses that have filled more than 200,000 positions.

Key Features

• Flat-fee pricing with unlimited users on every plan
• Job posting and syndication to multiple boards
• Customizable hiring workflows and pipelines
• Compliance tools (EEO/OFCCP reporting)
• Offers and eSignatures (Pro tier)

What It Offers Over Greenhouse

JazzHR’s transparency and flat-fee, unlimited-user model make it dramatically cheaper than Greenhouse for teams that want broad stakeholder participation. All three tiers are publicly listed with no sales call required, and there’s a 21-day free trial.

The limitations: the entry Hero plan caps you at 3 open jobs (overages run ~$9/job/month), essential features like candidate texting, eSignatures, and advanced reporting are add-ons on lower tiers, and JazzHR has not kept pace on modern AI. There’s no AI screening, AI interviews, or built-in candidate sourcing.

G2 Rating	⭐ 4.3 out of 5 (~483 reviews on G2; 4.3 on Capterra across ~487 reviews)
Pricing	Hero $75/mo, Plus $269/mo, Pro $420/mo (annual billing); monthly rates higher ($99/$325/$499). Unlimited users; 21-day free trial.

8. Breezy HR

Best For

Small teams that want a visual, easy-to-use ATS with a genuinely free starter plan and flat monthly pricing.

Breezy HR is a modern, design-forward ATS known for its drag-and-drop Kanban pipelines and one of the cleanest interfaces in the category. It offers a permanently free Bootstrap plan (one active position) and flat-fee paid tiers with unlimited users, a real advantage for teams with many light hiring-manager users.

Key Features

• Drag-and-drop Kanban candidate pipelines
• Free Bootstrap plan + flat monthly paid tiers
• One-click posting to 50+ job boards and branded career sites
• Built-in video interviews and automated scheduling
• Breezy Intelligence AI add-on, SMS, and onboarding modules

What It Offers Over Greenhouse

Breezy is roughly 60–70% cheaper than Greenhouse for comparable core features, includes unlimited users on flat monthly plans, and offers a free tier so very small teams can start at zero cost, none of which Greenhouse provides.

The catch is aggressive feature gating: interview scorecards and eSignatures require the Growth plan ($273/mo), while HRIS integrations, offer management, and nurture campaigns are locked to Business ($439/mo). AI capabilities are thin and sold as credit-based add-ons, and some reviewers report inconsistent integrations.

G2 Rating	⭐ 4.4 out of 5 (~683 reviews)
Pricing	Free (Bootstrap), Startup $157/mo, Growth $273/mo, Business $439/mo (annual billing); monthly higher ($189/$329/$529). Custom Pro tier; unlimited users.

9. Pinpoint

Best For

In-house recruiting teams that prioritize candidate experience and employer branding and want unlimited seats with white-glove onboarding.

Pinpoint is a polished, candidate-experience-first ATS that treats recruiting as a marketing function. It pairs a strong branded career-site builder with structured selection tools (anonymized screening, scorecards, scheduling, offer management) and a growing AI suite: AI Match Score, AI Hiring Copilot, and an AI Notetaker. Pricing is flat by company size with unlimited users, and implementation is included.

Key Features

• Branded, multilingual career site builder
• Talent-pipeline CRM and anonymized (blind) screening
• Candidate scorecards, scheduling, and offer management
• AI Candidate Match Score, Hiring Copilot, and Notetaker
• Unlimited users; 100+ integrations and open API

What It Offers Over Greenhouse

Pinpoint includes implementation in the contract (a notable advantage over Greenhouse, which charges separately for onboarding), and its flat, unlimited-seat model means a 10-recruiter team pays the same as a 3-recruiter team.

But it’s still quote-only with no public rate card, requires a sales demo and annual contract, and offers no free trial. Pricing estimates vary widely: recent 2026 figures put Growth near $600/month for small teams, scaling to ~$2,400/month for 150–500 employees, with Enterprise roughly $5,500–$12,000/month for 500+. Its differentiating AI and blind-screening features sit in the higher tiers, and it tracks applicants rather than proactively sourcing them.

G2 Rating	⭐ 4.6 out of 5 (~100 reviews)
Pricing	Custom, quote-only; estimates vary. Growth ~$600–$2,400/mo by headcount; Enterprise ~$5,500–$12,000/mo (500+ employees). Annual contracts; no free trial; implementation included.

10. Recruitee

Best For

Collaborative hiring teams that want an easy-to-use, mid-market ATS with broad job-board reach and unlimited users.

Recruitee (owned by Tellent, alongside KiwiHR and Javelo) is a collaborative-hiring ATS designed to get the whole team (including non-HR hiring managers) involved through shared profiles, real-time notes, and scorecards. It offers a no-code career-site builder, access to a large job-board network, and AI-powered tools, with a reputation for being intuitive and affordable relative to enterprise ATS platforms.

Key Features

• No-code career site builder and broad job-board distribution
• Collaborative hiring with shared notes and scorecards
• Automated pipelines and AI-powered emails
• Built-in scheduling, screening, and analytics dashboards
• LinkedIn Recruiter and HRIS integrations

What It Offers Over Greenhouse

Recruitee is easier to adopt and meaningfully cheaper than Greenhouse, with unlimited users and a clean collaborative-hiring workflow. A similar feature set in Greenhouse hiring software can cost more annually, and Recruitee’s implementation costs are lower.

On the downside, Recruitee doesn’t publish pricing prominently (quotes scale by company size and job slots), bakes in a renewal increase, gates AI screening credits and matching searches on lower tiers, and some reviewers note its reporting and customization are limited for complex operations. Note that pricing has risen recently and is now billed in euros.

G2 Rating	⭐ 4.5 out of 5 (~449 reviews)
Pricing	Tiered by job slots and quote-based, billed in EUR. Entry Launch plan is now ~€301/month (≈$330), up from $199 in 2024; the top Lead tier runs ~$600–$900/month for mid-market teams. ~15–20% discount for annual billing; 18-day free trial.

11. Manatal

Best For

Recruitment agencies and lean in-house teams that want the most affordable AI-powered ATS and recruitment CRM available.

Manatal is an AI-native ATS and recruitment CRM out of Bangkok that consistently ranks as one of the most affordable platforms with real AI features. Starting at $15/user/month, it undercuts most competitors while including AI candidate scoring, social-media profile enrichment, semantic and Boolean search, and even an AI Interviewer and AI Notetaker. Notably, Manatal is the first ATS to offer an MCP server that connects to LLMs like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.

Key Features

• AI candidate scoring, matching, and recommendations
• Social-media profile enrichment and CV parsing
• Semantic and Boolean candidate search
• Customizable pipelines and (higher-tier) workflow automation
• MCP server for ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini; 2,500+ job boards

What It Offers Over Greenhouse

Manatal’s price-to-feature ratio is hard to beat: comparable AI features from enterprise tools cost 3–5x more, pricing is fully transparent, and there’s a 14-day free trial with no credit card, none of which Greenhouse offers. It’s an excellent value for agencies and small teams.

The limitations: per-user pricing means costs climb as you add recruiters, workflow automations are locked to the Enterprise tier, API access and SSO require the top Enterprise Plus tier, reporting and search filtering are basic, and the integration ecosystem is narrower than established players. Some reviewers also report that AI match scores don’t always reflect true job fit.

G2 Rating	⭐ 4.3 out of 5
Pricing	Professional $15/user/mo (15 jobs, 10k candidates), Enterprise $35/user/mo (unlimited + automations), Enterprise Plus $55/user/mo (SSO, API). 14-day free trial.

Choosing the Right Greenhouse Alternative

Greenhouse is powerful, but not every team needs an enterprise structured-hiring platform, or its price tag and sales process. Your ideal alternative depends on what matters most:

• Best-in-class analytics for a scale-up → Ashby
• Transparent, published pricing for the mid-market → Workable
• ATS + CRM for outbound sourcing → Lever
• HR system + light ATS in one → BambooHR
• Employer branding and a beautiful career site → Teamtailor or Pinpoint
• Flat-fee, unlimited users on a budget → JazzHR or Breezy HR
• Collaborative hiring with broad job-board reach → Recruitee
• The cheapest AI-powered ATS → Manatal

But if you’re a small business with 10–75 employees and your top priorities are getting enterprise-grade hiring features (branded careers pages, AI application scoring, semantic candidate search, interview scheduling, Slack/Teams/Chat integrations, and AI assistants like Claude and ChatGPT) at a significant discount, without sales demos or enterprise complexity, Plural is the standout choice.

It’s free to start with no credit card and a 14-day free trial, and scales through simple, transparent tiers (Core $59/mo, Grow $299/mo, Enterprise $999+/mo) instead of opaque, headcount-based enterprise contracts.

Get started with Plural.

Sources

Pricing for tools that don’t publish public rates is buyer-reported and current as of June 2026; verify with each vendor before purchasing.

• Greenhouse: G2 Summer 2026 awards · pricing estimates
• Ashby: official pricing · G2 reviews
• Workable: pricing & plans · Forbes Advisor award · G2 reviews
• Lever: pricing & ownership · G2 reviews
• BambooHR: pricing analysis · ease-of-use data · G2 reviews
• Teamtailor: pricing analysis · G2 reviews
• JazzHR: official pricing · pricing & company stats · G2 reviews
• Breezy HR: official pricing · G2 reviews
• Pinpoint: pricing analysis · G2 reviews
• Recruitee: official pricing · ownership (Tellent) · pricing trend · G2 reviews
• Manatal: official pricing · MCP server announcement · G2 reviews